Skip to content

UX & Accessibility

A pronoun standard isn’t complete without guidance on how users provide and see pronouns. This section is recommended (non-normative) except where a specific conformance requirement references it.

  • Make it optional. Never require pronoun disclosure. Mark the field clearly optional, and allow it to be left blank or set to “Prefer not to say”.

  • Use clear, inclusive language. Label the field “Pronouns” — not “Gender” (a different concept) and not “Preferred Pronouns” (discouraged, since a person’s pronouns are not a preference). A short hint like “(e.g. she/her, they/them)” can guide users.

  • Provide common options plus custom. Offer a list of common sets (She/Her, He/Him, They/Them, and increasingly recognized neopronouns like Ze/Zir, Xe/Xem) and always allow a custom entry. Avoid an “Other” catch-all in a dropdown — it otherizes people. A combo box or checkboxes with a “Custom…” option that reveals a text field works well and future-proofs the design.

  • Allow multiple selection. Many people use more than one set. Use checkboxes or multi-select chips rather than a single-choice radio. If a user both selects from the list and types a custom entry, ideally retain both, handling edge cases gracefully.

  • Order and priority. If multiple pronouns are chosen, you may let users order them (e.g. drag-and-drop), but don’t imply a hierarchy unless the user expresses one. Default to the order selected or entered.

  • Context and education. Explain why pronouns are collected — e.g. “Sharing your pronouns is optional. We ask to ensure we address you correctly.” Linking to a resource for users who want to learn more builds trust.

  • Privacy controls. Where pronouns may be sensitive, let users control visibility. The privacy field supports this. Specifics vary by context, but giving users control is important.

  • Display custom entries as entered. Show custom pronoun sets exactly as the user provided them (apart from capitalization adjustments). Don’t auto-translate or abbreviate someone’s pronouns.

  • Prominent placement. Place pronouns near the name (e.g. “Dr. Alex Chen (they/them)”) to normalize their use. Avoid styling that treats pronouns as a warning — make them as ordinary as a title or nickname.

  • Accessibility. Ensure pronoun information is screen-reader friendly — e.g. announce “Pronouns: she, her” rather than reading the slash awkwardly. Provide aria-labels, keyboard navigability, proper labels, and alt text for any icons.

  • Avoid assumptions when blank. Don’t infer pronouns from name or appearance. Leave the display blank or use the person’s name until they specify. Don’t fill blanks with negative-sounding placeholders like “None given”; treat it as missing data.

  • Updates and versioning. Respect changes seamlessly and reflect new pronouns everywhere. Pronouns aren’t a one-time static field; let users update them at any time.

  • Avoiding misuse. Any open text field can be misused. Content moderation is out of scope for the technical standard, but a list-plus-custom approach helps (most users pick from the list; outliers can be reviewed). The standard’s ethos is to treat all user-entered pronouns as valid and to educate stakeholders that these entries are to be honored, not questioned.